.png){kind=logo}
Luke Muelhauser confronts William Lane Craig with the inconsistency between his divine command interpretation of morality, according to which things are moral or immoral as solely determined by God’s calling them as such, on the one hand, and his insistence that in this way God is the source of “objective morality”: But let us say [...]
Posts Tagged ‘Religious Apologetics’
Are Divine Command Theory And Objective Morality Mutually Exclusive Concepts?
June 9th, 2010 
Daniel Fincke 
Posted in Arguments for the Existence of God, Christianity, Ethics, Metaethics, Morality, Philosophical Ethics, Philosophy, Religion 
Tags: Christian Apologetics, Common Sense Atheism, Divine Command Theory, Luke Muelhauser, Objective Morality, Religious Apologetics, Subjective Morality, William Lane Craig 
7 Comments »How Apologetic Goals Compromise Christian Apologists’ Historical Research
June 8th, 2010 Daniel Fincke Appealing to insights of the great theologian Paul Tillich, Robert M. Price takes on the corruption of research when it has a defensive agenda. (Sadly, this video was taken down from YouTube) via Your Thoughts?
Posted in Christianity, History, Jesus, Religion Tags: Apologetics, Paul Tillich, Religious Apologetics, Resurrection of Jesus, Robert M. Price No Comments »Sundaily Hilarity: Why The King James Bible Is Superior To Science Books
October 25th, 2009 Daniel Fincke This guy is off the charts unintentionally hilarious in so many ways. He’s a must-see for fans of religulousness: Your Thoughts?
On “Concern-Troll Apologists”
August 11th, 2009 Daniel Fincke Daylight Atheism exposes a disingenuous tactic for addressing atheists: Concern trolling is defined as masquerading as an ally or a friend in order to offer your enemies “helpful advice” that, if taken, would hurt and undermine them. For example, take this condescending report by Zoe Brennan of the U.K. Daily Mail on the summer camp [...]
Recent Comments